MP61-10: Prognostic role of FGFR alterations and FGFR mRNA expression in metastatic urothelial cancer treated with anti-PD(L1) inhibitors in first an second line setting
Friday, May 15, 2020
7:00 AM – 9:00 AM
Florian Roghmann, Ralph M Wirtz, Ademi Santiago-Walker, Jonas Jarczyk, Maximilian C Kiregmair, Thomas S Worst, Danijel Sikic, Sven Wach, Helge Taubert, Veronika Weyerer, Robert Stoehr, Karl Tully, Friedemann Zengerling, Christian Bolenz, Johannes Breyer, Maximilian Burger, Stefan Porubsky, Arndt Hartmann, Philipp Erben, Markus Eckstein, Hendrik Jütte
Introduction: In the era of individualized oncological therapy in bladder cancer, FGFR3 mutations, FGFR2 and FGFR3 gene fusions as well as FGFR mRNA expression as potential oncological targets and their association to anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 (IO) treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB) was studied in a German patient cohort.
Methods: Within a cohort of 72 patients with metastatic UCB from 5 academic centers in Germany (collected between 2016 and 2018) FGFR3 mutations, FGFR2 and FGFR3 gene fusions as well as FGFR expression in formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) tumour samples from the primary tumour or metastatic sites and its association to survival was examined using SNaPshot PCR, RT-qPCR as well as Next Generation Sequencing. Statistical analyses comprised Kaplan-Meier survival analyses, Spearman rank correlations, non- parametric testing.
Results: In 17% of all patients FGFR3 mutations or gene fusions could be detected. Patients with FGFR3 alterations did not have better outcome in response to immunoncology (IO) treatment (p=0.201). All alterations of FGFR3 resulted in overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA. Combination of FGFR mutation analysis and FGFR mRNA assessment improved IO outcome prediction. Overexpression of FGFR3 mRNA was negatively associated with PDL1 expression (mRNA and protein level). High FGFR2 mRNA expression in primary tumors predicted better disease specific survival of UCB patients receiving IO therapy, whereas high FGFR3 mRNA expression was associated with tumor specific death in patients exhibiting of low FGFR2 mRNA expressions (p<0.05). This high risk group of UCB patients exhibiting high mRNA levels FGFR3 comprises 40% of the total cohort.
Conclusions: The assessment of FGFR mRNA by standardized RT-qPCR identified a high risk UCB patient cohort, which does have inferior disease specific survival despite IO treatment and does overexpress FGFR3 mRNA. The assessment of FGFR mRNA levels by using this standardized, locally applicable FGFR testing could identify an FGFR inhibitor target population with poor response to IO treatment which is twice the size as currently detected by FGFR genomic alterations alone. Source of
Funding: Janssen, Research & Development, LLC, USA