Oncology

Research Abstract

O15 - Comparison of Various Imaging Modalities for Setup Verification Prior to Delivery of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers in Veterinary Patients (VCS Award Winner)

Thursday, June 14
5:45 PM - 6:00 PM
Location: WSCC 615

INTRODUCTION
The “gold standard” for patient positioning verification before linac-based stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) is cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which is not available in all clinics; planar imaging is sometimes used instead. The purpose of this study was to quantify errors inherent to orthogonal megavoltage (MV) portal and kilovoltage (kV/kV) imaging versus CBCT when used to verify setup of bony targets. Our hypothesis was that use of planar imaging would necessitate inclusion of a setup margin in the planning target volume (PTV) expansion.


MATERIALS AND METHODS
All patients receiving head and neck SRT were considered for inclusion in this prospective clinical study. Planar (MV ports and kV/kV images) and rotational (CBCT) images were acquired before treatment, and manually co-registered with the reference image set. Differences in patient position (vertical, lateral, longitudinal, pitch, yaw, and roll) when matched based on MV ports, kV/kV images, and CBCT were compared.  


RESULTS
Eighty-two independent data sets were evaluated. Mean differences in lateral, longitudinal and vertical directions from MV ports to kV/kV images were 1.0, 0.4 and 0.8 mm, respectively, with a mean 3D vector of 1.7 mm³. Mean angular difference in pitch and yaw were 0.3 and 0.4°. Mean differences from MV ports to CBCT images were 1.2, 0.7, and 1.3 mm, respectively, with a mean vector of 2.2 mm³. Mean angular differences were 0.7 and 0.5°. The mean roll detected on CBCT was 0.6°; this could not be quantified with planar imaging. 


CONCLUSIONS
The mean shift discrepancies described herein should be accounted for in the setup margin for linac-based SRT; failure to do so could result in early treatment failure due to geographic miss. Size of the PTV expansion can be minimized through use of CBCT and correction of visible positioning errors using a robotic couchtop, or meticulous manual positioning.

Leanne Magestro, DVM

Radiation Oncology Resident
North Carolina State University

Leanne Magestro is a Resident in Radiation Oncology at North Carolina State University.

Presentation(s):

Send Email for Leanne Magestro


Assets

O15 - Comparison of Various Imaging Modalities for Setup Verification Prior to Delivery of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers in Veterinary Patients (VCS Award Winner)

Handout

Attendees who have favorited this

Please enter your access key

The asset you are trying to access is locked. Please enter your access key to unlock.

Send Email for Comparison of Various Imaging Modalities for Setup Verification Prior to Delivery of Stereotactic Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancers in Veterinary Patients (VCS Award Winner)